Have your say and share your ideas. Join us on the road to simplicity.
Latest discussions | Popular discussions | Conclusions

Personal Information

Contributor name: abum96
Karma:
Contributor since: Jan 11, 2007
Last seen: Jan 11, 2007

Voting patterns

What abum96 thinks of other contributors' views

90% (44 votes) agreed

What other contributors thinks of abum96's views

67% (4 votes) agreed

Latest comments posted

Expiration dates on products
abum96 thinks: I agree with tommyd. Regardless of the product, it is up to the consumer to judge the quality and decide if a product is truly worth buying.

Are newspapers and magazines a dying medium?
abum96 thinks: I can't imagine the newspaper ever dying out. It is a way of life for many people to wake up to the paper to stay informed.

How can we avoid remembering passwords?
abum96 thinks: It's simply a matter of coming up with forms of identification that are more reliable and of course more secure.

Inhabiting the Moon and Mars
abum96 thinks: I'd have to think that finding ways to inhabit our own planet is the cheaper and easier way to go. The human species and all other life forms we know of, after all, started on this planet for a reason.

Computers as entertainment devices
abum96 thinks: Convergence is inevitable. Just look at the new iphone. When given the choice, consumers would rather have everything in one I would think.

Latest comments agreed with

How can innovative ideas help the poorest.
Simpler thinks: check out this wood burning stove. it eliminates the cooking smoke that kills many poor people, while allowing more cooking to be done with less fuel - thus reducing CO2 emissions. it can even be produced locally. I think this is a nice example of how technology can help the poor... check it out:

How can innovative ideas help the poorest.
chrisek thinks: It isn't hard to ship a water pump to Africa to ensure a village has clean drinking water. It isn't difficult to teach people and give them basic tools to help them survive and thrive. Those that are less fortunate need to be taught to care for their own, not just given the things they need. They need to be able to sustain themselves rather than rely on outsiders for survival.

How can innovative ideas help the poorest.
JBonnin thinks: The straw mentioned above is just one of those perfect revolutionary ideas: cheap, simple, able to benefit big populations.

Howeve­r ideas like this one are fruit of deliberate research directed to the problem of poverty. Poverty can only be faught through a strong political will combining both immediate assistance and long term programs.


The beauty of pressing buttons
Champ thinks: I think the idea of customer service is slowly being lost by most corporations. They are more concerned with selling products to consumers, not trying to help them when something goes wrong. That would require extra costs that takes away from their profit.

The beauty of pressing buttons
chrisek thinks: I like automated services. I don't like waiting to hear my options. For some reason the one I want is always at the end of the list making me wait through half a dozen other options. I also don't like being caught in an endless loop when you can't find an option that relates to your problem and a operator option is not available. That's just bad customer service. Maybe automated services should be saved for simple routine tasks and leave the major issues for a person to resolve.

Latest comments disagreed with

The beauty of pressing buttons
Alexkaatsch thinks: I guess that until we get AI's, we need people to help us. We all know that automated systems are such utter rubbish they make you scream.... I presume they are there to save money (probably quite a lot), but they only interface with us when we least need to experience their unique kind of misery... when we are seeking help. Any business or service provider blatently shows its colours by engaging in this practice by pandering to share-holders through cost-savings and spitting at us, the customer by reacting to a call for help with a slap in the face..... the worst of all is that neither reason is good for business ultimately. Just look at BT...... a company with an atrocious customer relations record. It is also loosing customer base like a fatal haemorage.... nobody likes the wretched company although, doubtless, it's run on the whole by similar individuals as are in any other company that is well thought of . The only difference is in the customer-relations department whose remit is ultimately at the behest of the board of directors. They seem greedy, callous, utterly uncaring and liars too.... irrespective of any other contrary truths that might hold sway. So.... people are best. Stupid machines are worse than useless. Use people.

Complicated Technology
NicNiewart thinks: The next frontier in every new gizmo is simplicity.

I have said this in my area of expertise- namely advertising and marketing-

for about 10 years.

I understand that many products rushed onto the market now are but half way steps between where we are and where we want to go. I understand that at first these gadgets are very expensive but as more and more are rolled out, the price falls, often dramatically.

BUT, the ones that get my vote are the ones where some thought has gone into the process and you plug it in, and guess what : IT WORKS! It seems a surprise where in this world today someone actually has thought about this, the next step and perhaps the biggest step. How often you get the thing: for example a computer and you have no idea of what you do, or who to get to help or what's gone wrong- it could be dozens of things. I am a consumer, I am not a nuclear physicist, and when I buy something, I expect it to do exactly what it says on the box, in the most intuitive and simplest way.

My latest Philips experience was one of pure joy- a Freeview box. I opened the package, plugged it all together, followed the instructions, pressed the right button- it scanned for all the stations, I waited for about five minutes, like it said, and that was that. It worked first time, simply and effectively. Although the price was about a third more than dodgy brands, I had a good experience, so my faith was justified, and I am more favourably disposed towards Philips for my next purchase.

Yes Technology is a wonderful thing, but only if it is harnessed to a human benefit. Would I have bought it if it was complicated? No.

Do we need it? Is it better ? Does it actually dry my hair faster, more gently, give me a clearer sharper picture, keep my food fresher and use less power- whatever it is, it has to deliver a benefit- even if it just a replacement low-tech item like say a kettle, but it has to do so in a way that is demonstrably better- which also is synonymous with simpler. If it can't , then I go for a Chinese-made no-brand toaster. I'm not one of those who will pay hundreds for a "designer" version which still manages to burn the toast.


Complicated Technology
chrisek thinks: Like anything, technology evolves and over time becomes easier to use. Innovators who always get the latest gadgets on the market always deal with countless issues using them. Functions soon become automated, customer complaints lead to better product design. I think the complexity of a product seems to be based on the point at which it's at in its evolution, not so much inthe task it's performing.

How can we avoid remembering passwords?
Alexkaatsch thinks: Firstly let me establish that I'm not any kind of expert ! I think that the internet's communication language needs re-writing/modifying/repl­acing so that a lone computer speaking to another computer elsewhere on the 'net can't be portayed identically by a third computer. In the same way that an individual recognises another individual, by habit, mannerism, appearance etc, so too should we be recognised by that which needs to know us. Genetic fingerprinting is all very well, but while we still rely on two computers saying 'yea' or 'nay' to each other based upon snatchable data, the whole silly idea is pointless.

Computers as entertainment devices
newman42 thinks: I like the idea of keeping things separate. Gaming consoles tend to upgrade every four or five years while computers used for things such as email and web browsing could potentially last a lot longer without needing upgrading. This could at least slow down obsolescence to some extent without detracting from the experience. Microsoft's Xbox 360 is a great example of keeping these systems separate while still coexisting and sharing resources.
Search in discussions
e.g. search for technology, christmas, future, bioscan