Have your say and share your ideas. Join us on the road to simplicity.
Latest discussions | Popular discussions | Conclusions

Personal Information

Contributor name: onesandshoe
Karma:
Contributor since: Dec 4, 2006
Last seen: Dec 4, 2006

Voting patterns

What onesandshoe thinks of other contributors' views

100% (1 vote) agreed

What other contributors thinks of onesandshoe's views

100% (2 votes) agreed

Latest comments posted

Ministry Of Truth 2006
onesandshoe thinks: Well said Skink , you have my vote , my opinion on the key word in your text was "interogation" , perhaps as far as usage of the English language goes that word itself might appear to be a little too strong but never the less it carries the weight necessary concerning questioning these people for answers in order that we be informed of their intentions before voting for them with the implication that if their intentions and our desires are not being fully met a little more interrogation might just be justified , and needless to say the whole purpose of interrogation would not be to put people " on the spot " but rather to " keep them on the ball " .

Which brings up the validity of politicians going @ it head to head " in debate " ?

Let them state their case about what it is that they want to do for the voting public , question them at that point for clarity , feasability , in order that we cleary understand our options before voting , vote , and if they produce all the better for all concerned , and if they don't find out why they didn'nt / couldn't produce , and if neccessary , vote them out of office .

(100% of 3 votes AGREE)
Is time the new currency?
onesandshoe thinks: If time is money then how nuch of it is going to take before we realize and begin to put to optimum

use the understanding that WE all are members of this race called humanity which inhabit this our planet , and that being case do we really have the wherewithall ( time money energy etc. etc. ) to continue to deal with the ongoing and adnauseum

time money energy etc. etc. theories concerning nationality , nationalism(s) ?
(50% of 6 votes AGREE)

Latest comments agreed with

Ministry Of Truth 2006
Skink thinks: Politicians aren't expected to divulge the secrets of national security and whatever else is required to be kept from the public, but lying about policies and things they say they will do in order to get votes is plain wrong, it's blatant deception and should not be allowed so therefore, I think that giving them a polygraph test is not the way, but some other form of "interrogation" in order to see if their intentions are noble is a great idea.
(100% of 10 votes AGREE)
Search in discussions
e.g. search for technology, christmas, future, bioscan